星期四, 6月 22, 2006
沒救了的台灣媒體
記得從幾年前開始，對於台灣媒體的報導我開始採取保留及懷疑的態度，不論是報紙、雜誌、電視、網路，因為漸漸發現，這些媒體不如同我以前所想像中的那麼公正無私，當他們報導一則新聞，容易加入自己主觀的意見及想法，進而導致報導的不夠公正，近一兩年，情況更是愈來愈糟，記者的素質不佳，別說是報導的公正性，就連用字遣詞都會狗屁不通，我對於所聽到的新聞的真實性，改成以先打五折再打七折來處理，也就是說當新聞報導說有有上千人傷亡，那可能只有三四百人，或是水淹1公尺，我心裡會想大概就是30公分吧!
到了近一年，記者不只是報導失真而已，更已經進步到生產新聞的階段，產業為了生存，為了收視率，轉型成為製造業，充分發揮我們在代工製造的強勁實力；而我則變成連聽新聞都懶得聽了，一個星期看新聞的時不會超過一個小時，而且通常是吃飯時老闆有開，就順便看一下，一個星期一個小時就足以讓我知道這星期台灣所發生的所謂的大事，這些媒體可以做得如此信用掃地，確依然不知羞恥的報的有聲有色。
2004年9月8日，CBS evening news主播 Dan Rather引用了由前德州陸軍國家警防衛隊的官員所提供的一份文件並且說此份文件己經經由專家證實，這些文件包含了對President George W. Bush 在1970年代於德州陸軍國家警防衛隊服務時的多所批評，這是George W. Bush具有爭議性的軍中服務的一部份。
這些文件立刻遭到其他媒體的質疑，因為其不符合當時的印刷技術，但是CBS及Rather仍然堅信他們的資料並繼續使用了兩個星期，其他媒體也繼續檢查及分析另一份由USToday所拿到的文件，最後升高了對於CBS news所宣稱的可信度的質疑，並使CBS於2004年9月20日出面聲明，Rather 說 "if I knew then what I know now – I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question." CBS News 主席 Andrew Heyward 說 "Based on what we now know, CBS News cannot prove that the documents are authentic, which is the only acceptable journalistic standard to justify using them in the report. We should not have used them. That was a mistake, which we deeply regret."並因此辭退了製作人 Mary Mapes 及要求數名執行製作辭職，許多人相信Rather 於2005年提早卸下做了24年的主播也是由於這個事件。
對於新聞工作人員高道德的要求，在台灣並沒有形成，新聞人員的素質不高，而對於新聞媒體檢討的聲音，也從來沒停過，就如同上面這支影片一樣，還是會有道德良知的人出來制橫；不過新聞媒體會發展成今天這個局面，全體有在看新聞的大眾是必須負很大的責任，因為社會大眾喜歡八卦，喜歡看聳動的標題，喜歡看社會新聞....等，媒體為了賺錢，為了生存，失去了本身應有的堅持，社會大眾也對報導這些聳動新聞的媒體給予實質的支持，造成劣質媒體經營的比較好，這些劣質媒體嘗到甜頭後，更變本加厲的挖掘更多連續劇式的新聞，最後這類新聞不夠了，乾脆自己製造，以滿足觀眾的口味及本身的收視率。
所以說台灣媒體的亂象，一大部份是觀眾及讀者需要負的責任，觀眾讀者的水準普遍不高，所以媒體即使製作出高品質的新聞電視節目，結果觀眾看不懂、不愛看，媒體活不下去，只好為五斗米折腰，潦落去，也只好跟著使用聳動誇張的方式來處理新聞。 常看到有人在抱怨台灣媒體的亂象的同時，卻又拼命看這這媒體的報導，這不是很諷刺嗎，唯有大部份的消費者能提升水準，不看不負責任的新聞媒體，環境自然會留下公正客觀的媒體而淘汱那些沒有道德良知的媒體。
期望大家都可以是一個能獨立思考，明辨是非的高水準讀者，讓劣質媒體可以被漸漸的淘汱。
星期三, 6月 21, 2006
Taipei Metro Railroad Transportation in 2011
This is the map of MRT Taipei after the project is done.
星期二, 6月 13, 2006
Computex Taipei 2006
Computex Taipei is the second largest computer exhibition in the world. This year there are over 1,300 companies attending this show and 2,900 booths in four exhibitions.
Every company shows their latest products or tedchnology. VIIV was the leading role of Intel in computex 2006. I could see VIIV logo, VIIV balloons everywhere. Many Taiwanese manufacturers also revealed their solution for Intel VIIV.
As an end user, I didn't see many disruptive technology. Most of them are old tech. with new applications such as Intel VIIV. I, however, are happy to see that hi-tech are getting more humanity. That's another reason why this companies hired so many show girls to soften the hard shows.
Inevitably, I changed my attention on those show girls because there are not many new tech or products. I joined their promotion shows, tried to grabed these free but maybe not useful gifts threw by these showgirls, and became obedient to say whatever they wanted me to say.
Every company shows their latest products or tedchnology. VIIV was the leading role of Intel in computex 2006. I could see VIIV logo, VIIV balloons everywhere. Many Taiwanese manufacturers also revealed their solution for Intel VIIV.
As an end user, I didn't see many disruptive technology. Most of them are old tech. with new applications such as Intel VIIV. I, however, are happy to see that hi-tech are getting more humanity. That's another reason why this companies hired so many show girls to soften the hard shows.
Inevitably, I changed my attention on those show girls because there are not many new tech or products. I joined their promotion shows, tried to grabed these free but maybe not useful gifts threw by these showgirls, and became obedient to say whatever they wanted me to say.
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)
